Tahir Ul-Qadri False Prophet?
Tahir Ul-Qadri is a Muslim cleric who just issued a Fatwa CONDEMNING suicide-bombing and terrorism.
Why are his words not credible?
The cleric spoke of the "Anti-Christ." Since Muslims revere Jesus but do not believe in the "Christ" concept popularized by Pauline Christianity--why would he use such a term?
Even the term "terrorism" is a Western construct. Who was Ul-Qadri really addressing? What audience? Is it a ploy to gain power with pro-Western factions in Pakistan?
His words ring false. Utterly false. And if I, a Westerner, see it as false, how can it resonate within Islam?
Why are his words not credible?
The cleric spoke of the "Anti-Christ." Since Muslims revere Jesus but do not believe in the "Christ" concept popularized by Pauline Christianity--why would he use such a term?
Even the term "terrorism" is a Western construct. Who was Ul-Qadri really addressing? What audience? Is it a ploy to gain power with pro-Western factions in Pakistan?
His words ring false. Utterly false. And if I, a Westerner, see it as false, how can it resonate within Islam?
Labels: anti-christ, false prophet, fatwa, jihad, terrorism, Ul-Qadri
posted by Wadena | 1:48 PM
2 Comments:
I don't agree with you. That's because you really haven't been reading what he wrote. He doesn't claim to have all the answers. He's just really trying to ask some of the hard questions. I really think you should read it over...
Well, a few weeks have passed, so the question now is.....HAVE his words resonated with Islam?
I suspect not. I think he was currying favor with Westerners and pro-Western elements in government.
The "Christ" references seem aimed at the West. That's Pauline theology, not Muslim.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home